That's right. Count 'em. Six. They're clearly labeled to the right.
I've been straining to find anything to write about this week, but there is nothing to write about except the nothing that is occuring here... er, or the nothing that is NOT occuring here. Wait. Nothing isn't occuring here never. "Nothing" is the occurance. Goddammit.
My wife says I have a deficiency in the area of double negtives. It pains someone like me to hear this as it is like having someone say, "you are clearly not able to stop breathing when submerged under water." The mechanism for double negatives seem simple enough: when a sentence has two negatives, ignore them. When the sentence has three negatives, take a deep breath, squint, then repeat the question back to the asker, hoping for a clarification using less cirmlocution or a complete topic change. The latter is used most often by my wife in between wiping the drool off my chin.
This is difficult enough for a person who has never memorized his multiplication tables nor his own age. Each time I'm confronted with either of these situations the Etch-A-Sketch of my weak cognition is shaken and the monkeys get to work tossing numbers at the wall until something sticks like white on rice (luckily, my mastery of metaphor amalgamation is not hindered by this).

"What's my age? Uhm..." I was born in 1980. It is currently 2005. 2005-1980=25, but my birthday has not occured yet this year, therefore 25-1=24. I am 24. "I am 24, Your Honor." *Self-satisfied swagger*
But then my wife tosses the wrench in the bathwater. She will ask me a question with one or more negatives, but then
switch the rules of multiples of negatives! The gall! God has allowed one man to rewrite the rules of grammar and pronunciation like this and I'll be damned if we make a mockery of his office. Here's an example:
"Don't you think this new top is cute?"
At this point marriage has injured my thinking enough to translate 'hot' to 'cute' (two terms which used to be miles separate in my mind), and thinking that the top IS cute I answer truthfully: "No". Do I
NOT think the top is cute? Of course I
don't think it is
not cute!
I quickly learn that Wife does not share my understanding of The Rules. Hours later, when my vision returns, I fail to convince her about the proper usage of "not". And I refuse to play the "ignore the not" game. Now I'm relegated to answering questions with recitation:
"Don't you think this new top is cute?"
"The top is cute."
"Didn't you like the salad?"
"I like salad. Specifically this salad."
"Wouldn't you rather watch Shakespeare in Love before Elizabeth?"
"I would prefer to not see Gweneth Paltrow at all, whatever the circumstance."
Ah, sweet middle ground.
11 Comments:
Interesting analogy.
1:15 PM, December 29, 2005
Doc! Dying for update. The clinical years are "behind the wall" so to speak and us young'uns demand insight!
7:39 PM, February 06, 2006
Dude. It's March. Time for an update.
11:15 PM, March 06, 2006
Since you don't post anymore, would you mind taking down the site, so as to prevent any further confusion between yourself and me, the original?
9:21 PM, April 30, 2006
Hey, i linked to you in case your interested. You may not have posted in a while but your older posts have cool little pictures.
3:05 AM, June 04, 2006
I can't believe that imposter docamazing actually wrote to you again! Keep the site up, even if you NEVER post again!
6:00 PM, June 05, 2006
Well, it's been a year. Done with my name yet?
11:26 PM, December 10, 2006
Still here?
10:24 PM, March 09, 2008
Years pass. You're still sullying my good name. Feel like taking this down yet?
3:40 PM, March 25, 2011
get over yourself dude
9:47 PM, March 25, 2011
looks interesting.good
2:33 PM, April 28, 2012
Post a Comment
<< Home